Can Humans Breastfeed Cats?

While human babies and kittens typically start their lives drinking milk from their mothers, human breast milk and cat breast milk are not the same. Human milk has a different amount of proteins, fats, and carbs than what a cat needs. It could stunt a kitten's growth and make it sick. If there is no nursing cat available to breastfeed kittens, it is recommended to get a cat breast milk formula replacement from the vet.

Cats and other animals have been breastfed by humans throughout history

Animals as Wet Nurses

In 18th- and 19th-century Europe, goats and donkeys were widely used to feed abandoned babies in foundling hospitals. The rise of syphilis increased the health risks of human wet nursing, making animal substitutes preferable. Before the invention of pasteurisation and sterilisation in the 19th century, direct suckling from animals was safer than drinking stored animal milk due to the risk of contamination by microbes during the milking process.

Religious and Cultural Reasons

The Jewish Talmud permits children to suckle animals if their welfare is at stake. In classical mythology, the suckling of infants by animals is a recurring theme. Romulus and Remus, the twin brothers who founded Rome, were famously portrayed as having been raised and suckled by a she-wolf.

Perceived Health Benefits

Breastfeeding animals has also been practised for perceived health reasons, such as hardening the nipples and improving milk flow. In Persia and Turkey, puppies were used for this purpose. In the United States in the early 19th century, it was recommended that expectant mothers use puppies to harden the nipples, improve breast secretion, and prevent inflammation.

Artistic and Political Statements

In modern times, the act of breastfeeding animals has been used as an artistic statement, sometimes controversially. For example, the album art for Tori Amos' "Boys for Pele" features a photograph of the singer breastfeeding a piglet.

A Global Practice

Human-to-animal breastfeeding has been observed in various parts of the world, including Northern Europe, the Middle East, South America, and Asia. While it may seem unusual, the practice has a long history and has served a variety of purposes, from practical to cultural and religious ones.

It is unsafe for humans to breastfeed animals and vice versa

While human-to-animal breastfeeding has been practiced in various cultures throughout history, it is important to recognize that this practice poses significant health risks for both humans and animals. Here are several reasons why it is unsafe for humans to breastfeed animals and vice versa:

Health Risks for Humans:

Human breast milk is specifically designed to meet the nutritional needs of human infants, and it may not provide the necessary nutrients for animal babies. Additionally, animals can carry different bacteria and diseases that can be transmitted to humans through their saliva or milk. For example, if an animal's milk is not properly stored, handled, and pasteurized, it can be contaminated with harmful microbes, leading to serious health issues for humans who consume it.

Health Risks for Animals:

Breastfeeding animals with human milk can be detrimental to their health. Human milk does not contain the specific nutrients required for the healthy growth and development of animal infants. It may lack the necessary vitamins, minerals, and other essential components found in their species-specific milk. Feeding human milk to animal babies can lead to nutritional deficiencies and impact their overall health and well-being.

Transmission of Diseases:

Breastfeeding between humans and animals can facilitate the transmission of diseases. Animals can carry different pathogens and infections that can be passed on to humans through their milk or direct contact. Similarly, humans can transmit diseases to animals through their breast milk. This transmission of diseases can have severe consequences for both parties involved.

Inadequate Nutritional Needs:

The nutritional requirements of animals differ significantly from those of humans. Human breast milk may not provide the specific nutrients, vitamins, and minerals that animal infants need for their growth and development. Feeding human milk to animals can lead to malnutrition and health issues in the long run.

Behavioral and Developmental Issues:

Breastfeeding is not only about nutrition but also about the bond and behavioral cues that are passed between a mother and her infant. When humans breastfeed animals, there is a risk of interfering with the natural mother-infant bonding process in the animal world. This disruption can potentially lead to behavioral and developmental issues in the animal babies.

In conclusion, while there is a long history of human-animal breastfeeding, it is crucial to understand that this practice is unsafe and can lead to adverse health consequences for both humans and animals. It is important to respect the unique biological needs of each species and provide species-specific care, including appropriate nutrition, to ensure the health and well-being of all.

Human-animal breastfeeding has been done for religious and cultural reasons

Human-animal breastfeeding has been practised in different cultures and time periods. The Jewish Talmud, for example, permits children to be suckled by animals if it is in the child's best interest. In the 18th and 19th centuries, goats and donkeys were commonly used to feed abandoned babies in European foundling hospitals.

The practice of women breastfeeding animals has also been done for perceived health reasons, such as hardening the nipples and improving milk flow, as well as for religious and cultural purposes. A variety of animals have been used for this, including puppies, kittens, piglets, and monkeys.

In some cases, human-animal breastfeeding has been influenced by cultural stories and mythology. For instance, the iconic image of Romulus and Remus, the twin brothers who founded Rome, being suckled by a she-wolf. Similarly, the Greek god Zeus was said to have been brought up by a goat.

Additionally, certain characteristics and beliefs were attributed to those who were suckled by animals. For example, the Swedish scientist Carl Linnaeus thought that being suckled by a lioness conferred great courage. Goats, on the other hand, were thought to transmit a libidinous character, while donkeys were considered more moral animals.

In modern times, human-animal breastfeeding continues to be practised by some cultures and has also been used as a form of artistic expression, sometimes sparking controversy.

Human-animal breastfeeding has been used for artistic and political statements

Human-animal breastfeeding has been practised in different cultures during various time periods. In the present day, the act of breastfeeding animals has been used as a sometimes controversial artistic statement.

One example of this is the album art for Boys for Pele by Tori Amos, which includes a photograph of the singer breastfeeding a piglet. This image sparked controversy when it was released. In a similar incident, a 22-year-old model and PETA member, Agata Dembiecka, became the focus of controversy in 2010 when a calendar issued by an animal rescue charity featured a photograph of her suckling a puppy.

Another instance of human-animal breastfeeding in art is the 2019 production by Dr Lara Stevens, which put the intimate act of breastfeeding on stage and asked the audience to consider what it means to be an ecofeminist mother to a girl in the 21st century. Stevens' work explored the suppression of our animality and the connection between the mistreatment of women and the mistreatment of the environment.

Human-animal breastfeeding has also been used to make political statements. For example, in 2017, Senator Larissa Waters became the first woman to breastfeed her baby in Federal Parliament. This act challenged the idea that breastfeeding is 'indecent' or 'provocative' and brought attention to the issue of public breastfeeding, which is still stigmatised in many places despite being legal.

Human-animal breastfeeding has been a topic of online viral content

This incident taps into a broader history of human-animal breastfeeding practices, which have been documented across different cultures and time periods. In ancient times, animals such as donkeys, cows, goats, sheep, and dogs served as substitute wet nurses for infants, particularly in the absence of lactating women or when wet nursing carried health risks. In classical mythology and historical accounts, we find stories of infants suckled by animals, such as Romulus and Remus, who were raised by a she-wolf, or Cyrus I of Persia, who was said to have been suckled by a dog.

In more recent times, human-animal breastfeeding has continued to capture attention, sometimes as a controversial artistic statement and other times as a compassionate act of kindness. For instance, a Thai woman's photo of breastfeeding a stray orphaned puppy went viral, eliciting praise for her selflessness. However, when two Swedish women were reported to have breastfed kittens, it led to concerns about their motivations and the potential health risks involved in concurrent breastfeeding of human and animal babies.

While human-animal breastfeeding may seem unusual or even shocking to some, it has been a topic of fascination and discussion for centuries. Online viral content centred around this theme continues to spark conversations and debates, reflecting a blend of humour, creativity, and cultural exploration.

Frequently asked questions